Vegan Yarn Review: Fibra Natura Sea Song

Sea Song is a soft, worsted weight natural fibre yarn consisting of 80% Pima cotton and 20% SeaCell®, a fibre derived from seaweed. The manufacturers make some claims about SeaCell which I find hard to believe, for example:

the structure of SeaCell® facilitates the active exchange of substances between the fiber and the skin – nutrients such as calcium, magnesium and vitamin E are released by the natural body moisture when the fiber is worn, thereby creating a complete sense of well-being.
—Smartfiber AG website

However, even if these claims are overblown the fact remains that adding SeaCell to cotton results in a very soft, comfortable yarn—noticeably softer than 100% cotton.

Sea Song comes in seven solid colours and eight variegated colours. The knitted sample above is in Sea Color, a variegated periwinkle blue/light jade green. I liked the fact that it is not too contrasty; I find that sometimes high contrast variegated yarns create a bold pattern which distracts from the lines of the garment. However some of the other variegated colours, like Spring, which is periwinkle blue, chartreuse, and dark green, are more contrasty if that is what you prefer.

Knitted up, Sea Song produces a soft, lightweight fabric ideal for summer clothing. I did have to take some care to prevent splitting while I was working, but I gather this is par for the course with multi-stranded cotton yarns. The yarn has a matte look.

Sea Song is made in Turkey. The manufacturer recommends hand-washing. In Toronto, you can buy it at the Purple Purl

Argh! Need to frog Gracefully Gathered Halter Top again!

Because I fell in love with a yarn which was the wrong weight for this pattern (Fibra Natura Sea Song in Sea Colors), I have been struggling to knit the Gracefully Gathered Halter Top in Knitting Lingerie Style by Joan McGowan Michael. The gauge is totally different, so I had to completely rewrite the pattern for the correct stitch count.

The pattern specifies the finished size of the top rather than the body measurement, so I decided to allow an inch or two of ease around the bust. Mistake! After knitting a few inches, my top was looking way too wide, but I had a naive hope that all would be well when I blocked it. However after knitting 6 inches, it was painfully clear that the top was way way way too large.

I frogged it completely, and started over again, with a circumference 20 stitches smaller. After a few inches of that, it was clearly still much to big, so I had to frog it again!

I eventually realized that, since on me the last complete round (shown as red in the diagram at the left) is below my bust (shown in pink), for me the circumference should be based on my under bust measurement, rather than my bust measurement. (This may not have been the way the designer intended it to fit, but then she won't be wearing it.) This is my third attempt, with a circumference of 140 stitches at the widest points (vs. the original 186), which gives slightly less than zero ease under the bust.

I stayed up way too late last night to finish it, trying it on periodically. I have got the circumference right at last (yay), although I had some trouble because now my circular needle is a bit too long (80 cm/~31" needle, ~71cm/~28" wide knitting). However, when I finally added the straps, I found that they cut painfully into my underarm area (where I put red circles on the photo at the top). This is partly my fault because I decreased by 12 stitches as specified in the pattern rather than adjusting for the smaller gauge of the yarn I was using, and I guess partly because I'm built differently. I'm going to have to frog the strap and top few inches and redo it two or three inches narrower. I'm also going to make the straps quite a bit longer, since I want to be able to tie them in a bow which is currently impossible. They are currently 16", I plan to make them 24" at least.